This is the most significant and terrific news mankind keeps getting: eating fish affects the oceans. Assessments of the living planet tell us that the Earth has entered a death spiral. We noticed that he more significant the issue, the less it will be examined.
Nonetheless, disputes exist everywhere. The media distracts us with news such as disputes between neighbors, instead of the real issues we face.
Therefore, we have to start looking at one of the most pertinent reasons as to why fishing endangers the sea.
The UN biodiversity report makes clear statements. The cause for the species extinction in the oceans and seas is NOT plastic. It is actually not even pollution or climate change. It’s overfishing and commercial fishing.
What is overfishing?
Ocean overfishing is, according to the National Geographic, “the taking of wildlife from the sea at rates too high for fished species to replace themselves”. As you can imagine, as much as climate change and pollution can affect the waters, the increase amount of fishing can have a negative impact on its health.
When you hear the word fisherman, what picture rings a bell? Somebody who resembles Captain Birdseye: white whiskers, twinkly eyes, sitting on a little red vessel chugging cheerfully over a shining ocean?
Assuming this is the case, your picture of this business model may require refreshing. An examination by Greenpeace a year ago uncovered that 29% of the UK’s amount of fishing is claimed by five families.
Immense boats from rich countries mop up the fish encompassing poor countries, denying a huge number of their significant wellspring of protein, while clearing out sharks, fish, turtles, gooney birds or dolphins.
Beach front fish cultivating has much more prominent effects, as fish and prawns are frequently benefited from whole marine biological systems: aimless trawlers dig up everything and crush it into fish meal.
If eating fish causes harm, what are the actions that we can take?
It is clear that nowadays we can start talking about the term “extinct fish”. What makes everything so frustrating is the fact that regulating the fishing industry is so easy and cheap. If we were to exclude commercial fishing from the seas or oceans, the catch would be due to rise because of the spillover effect.
The fish breed would grow and spill over into the surrounding waters. Where seas and oceans benefit from protection in some parts of the world, catches are starting to grow dramatically. Even if fishing would be banned across the entire high seas, the world’s fish catch would drastically rise into the national waters.
Nonetheless, there is almost no fish that we can safely eat. Even the Marine Stewardship Council label is no guarantee of sound practice. For example, this council certified tuna fisheries where the endangered sharks had been caught. Therefore, we can’t talk yet about sustainable fishing practices.
In conclusion, until fishing is properly contained and regulated, we should permanently withdraw our consent.
Yes, it is a perfect practice to stop using plastic by all means. But if we really want to make a difference to our dearest seas, we should stop eating fish whatsoever.